Fun With Numbers: Evolving Oricon Totals and Delayed-Impact Manga Boosts

Those who follow manga sales are probably aware of the not-at-all-uncommon phenomenon where, following an anime that successfully catches people’s attention, every volume of the series, old and new, gets back on the Oricon weekly charts, and sometimes stays there for an extended period of time. The resulting re-chart numbers for the series can be broken down in a number of ways. I’m going to be looking on a particular test case (Nanatsu no Taizai’s performance over last Fall) which shows how those numbers can be interpreted.

The Nanatsu no Taizai manga series got what is by any metric a substantial boost in sales from the anime. From the 13-week period starting with the week of October 6-12 and going until the end of December, the first 10 volumes charted together, taking up one-fifth of the top 50, in 8 separate weeks. However, the way they charted evolved as time went on. Here’s how the volumes of the series stacked up against each other on that first October week:

10. *48,513 *,476,099 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.1
11. *45,629 *,453,452 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.2
16. *40,609 *,424,405 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.3
19. *36,570 *,396,046 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.4
24. *33,583 *,394,860 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.5
26. *30,447 *,383,580 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.6
28. *28,983 *,374,842 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.7
30. *28,180 *,332,249 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.10
31. *28,084 *,354,996 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.9
32. *27,927 *,369,899 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.8

And here’s what they looked like at the end of December:

25. *37,085 *,667,255 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.10
31. *33,864 *,700,757 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.7
32. *33,703 *,671,099 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.9
33. *33,516 *,689,629 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.8
36. *31,451 *,706,396 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.6
39. *28,361 *,721,921 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.4
40. *28,122 *,718,480 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.5
41. *27,717 *,811,313 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.1
42. *27,659 *,782,681 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.2
43. *27,597 *,749,448 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.3

Quite a difference in order there. That first week saw the volumes selling basically by volume number priority (v8-10 were out of order, but separated by less than 300 units-effectively tied), but 13 weeks later that trend was reversed, with the latter half of the series’ run on top by several thousand units. This difference is caused in large part by a simple factor – not everybody who buys the manga as a result of the anime buys the whole thing at once. Either because manga fans are either young and yen-strapped or hesitant to buy a whole manga based on one or two episodes of anime, they often start off by buying the first volume or first few volumes. One of the quickest ways to measure that effect is to look at the lifetime totals of the early volumes compare with that of the most recent volume. If there’s a difference in the speed at which the volumes gain sales, it should be fairly obvious there, as early volumes separate and then “rebound” as the later volumes catch up. I took the overall sales figures for v1-v10 each week, using weekly sales to derive those numbers for weeks which had a gap, and produced the following plot:

Nanatai-boostspeed(Note: -1 on the x-axis means the week before the anime aired and boosts started happening. I derived this by subtracting weekly sales from Oct 6-12 from the same week’s lifetime totals. It’s essentially the pre-anime state of the series.)

This chart, I think, makes it fairly obvious that early volumes create a gap between themselves and the later ones in the first month of a boost, then see that gap stay at constant levels for a while before finally shrinking down to close to where it originally was. Meanwhile, the later volumes fail to separate themselves from the most recent one – the gap even shrinks a bit for them! This suggests a possible pattern of group behavior for newer fans of this series:

1. In the first week, new fans buy the early volumes (sometimes v1, sometimes v1-v3) to check things out and see if the manga is hot stuff, or because they lack the pocket money to buy in bulk. Others with less inhibition buy the whole series.

2. Over the next week or two, fans who bought the early volumes who are now sold on the series and/or in possession of their latest allowance/paycheck, buy the rest of the series. Meanwhile, fans who waited an extra episode or two to go in for the manga get into the action, buying the first few volumes as others did a week ago, obscuring the effects of the first group’s delayed purchasing.

3. Over time, the supply of new fans from the anime tapers off and the later volumes become more prominent in the weekly charts.

These data are important because, if nothing else, they show that manga don’t catch on in an instant with many individual buyers – the differences in week-to-week sales between volumes 1 and 10 are too large for Oricon fuzz to account for all of them. Many people aren’t going to buy volume 12 of the series without having first bought 1-11, and it’s demonstrable here that their doing so takes time. This is particularly important to consider when looking at manga boosts for series with double-digit length and a young/teen target demographic, where time-lag of this type would prevent the full magnitude of the boost from being immediately visible in a new volume coming out two days after the anime’s airdate.*

Of course, this data is just as it pertains to Nanatsu no Taizai. Other series can and do have different sets of fans who likely behave differently. There are other series one could compare to get a better baseline (Shingeki no Kyojin, Tokyo Ghoul, etc.), but the overwhelming fraction of manga, even those that make the Oricon charts, don’t sell enough to get the entire series back on them for an extended period of time. What I’d really like to be able to compare would be a short series targeted more towards adults, but those less frequently get adapted, and even those that do get to re-chart in their entirety do so sporadically. Gekkan Shojo Nozaki-kun, for example, re-charted all volumes for multiple weeks, but only started doing so 2 weeks after the anime started. By that point in Nanatsu no Taizai’s run, the gaps in volume totals had already locked down in size. In theory, shorter series with more adult fans could see less delay between their fans buying the first and last volumes, but there just aren’t a lot of comparable test cases out there.

*I say this in particular because I’ve encountered a decent share of people who diagnosed Akame ga Kill as an anime which produced no manga boost based on data from a volume that came out before the series aired on TV. The series in question went from selling 52,214 in 2 weeks (v10) pre-anime to 168,053 in 2 weeks (v11) post-anime. It’s not the first time such a delayed-impact boost has happened either; Binbougami ga and Toriko both got one. At least with multi-volume teen-audience series, calling it early is likely to mean calling it wrong on a regular basis.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Fun With Numbers: Evolving Oricon Totals and Delayed-Impact Manga Boosts

  1. That’s interesting. I never considered delay impact being an issue before. A question about the chart: It the y-axis zeroed against the current week’s vol.10 sales, or the latest vol.10 sales data you have?

    • The y-axis is zeroed to the total volume 10 sales in that particular week. For example, in week 0:

      10. *48,513 *,476,099 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.1
      30. *28,180 *,332,249 Nanatsu no Taizai Vol.10

      Gives a v1-v10 value of 476099-332249=143850. If, next week, v1 gains more than v10, the value goes up, and if v10 gains more than v1, the value goes down.

      In a way, it’s not the ideal way to display the information because a change could result in a week when both got more sales, but it’s convenient for what’s being looked at here. If I plotted versus a constant v10 value, it would obscure the relative changes with the much larger weekly increase in totals.

  2. I believe Akame Ga Kill did present a boost. If people had instead used the total copies in circulation number from the publisher they would have seen that Akame ga Kill had completely doubled its circulation during the anime. Perhaps people shouldnt only look to Oricon for their sales data.

    • Oricon does have plenty of issues, and we’ve seen it can underestimate publisher figures by anywhere between 0 and 80%: https://animetics.net/2014/09/10/fun-with-numbers-the-big-range-of-big-underestimates-in-oricon-weekly-manga-totals/

      But the pre/post-anime difference did show up there, just not immediately (in December, with the next new volume, rather than in July). The point I’m making is that oricon should only be used with confidence to measure a season’s worth of anime->manga bumps a few months after the fact.

      Publisher figures, though useful, are available on an inconsistent basis. I personally wasn’t aware of any publisher-released figures for Akame (would love a link to the source if you have one). The reporting on them also tends to be sparse – e.g. I wouldn’t know Ace of the Diamond had a circulation total in excess of 20 million copies if I hadn’t happened to personally buy the 41st volume (where that declaration was published).

      • Akame ga kill anime twitter gave numbers

        believe in the july issue it said it was at 1mln before that.

        • Interesting. Can also check that figure against how much we expect Oricon wekkly totals to be (about 60% of the actual). So in a month (call it five weeks) they sold 900,000 units, split among 10 volumes, for an average of (900000/10)/5=18,000 copies per volume. Lowest threshold for a week in July was 17,402. So if they get the standard level of Oricon reporting, they’d have been a good 6-7k below the thresholds each week. Definitely another case of Oricon-invisible slow burning success.

  3. Simply wish to say your aticle is as surprising. The clarity for your
    post is just nice and that i could assume
    you are a professional in this subject. Fine along wth your
    permission allow me to seize your feed to stay up to date with
    forthcoming post. Thank you a million annd
    please carry on the gratifying work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s